Because your evidences are not consistent to the conclusion

Click to Read
Related Article

A follow-up on Haiti Election 2010 - How The Fraud Was Done, Because your evidences are not consistent to the conclusion that you present or that you seek, I feel oblige to dismiss your efforts.

In fact, I doubt and question your motivations.

You create more troubles by suggesting dishonest conclusions.

All the data (evidences) that you presented say that there were frauds in the locality of OUANAMINTHE that benefit (10) JOAZARD CLAUDE, INITE.

I think it is vicious from you to generalize from one sample data.

Your conclusions betrayed your true intentions and they show that you are being deliberately dishonest.

Candidate Michel Martelly admitted

Related Article:

Haiti Election 2010 - How The Fraud Was Done

YOU HAVE TO READ THIS... Do you want to know how the Haiti election fraud was done? Do you really want to know how every single INITE candidate...

REPLY to this message

📘 Share this on Facebook

✖️ Share this on X (formerly Twitter)

Return to Message List

Direct replies to this message:

Comments

@Capoislamort December 22 2010
Sergo, i hear you clearly, and i hope that what i am about to say in reply is in tune with your statement: 1- The youth will not stand for the vote...
Reply

@Capoislamort December 22 2010
Please let me clarify my last statemtn of: "Of the votes counted on Nov 28, almost 78% (Jude/Inite got 22+ - governing establishment which has been...
Reply

@Pasteur Elinord Pierrot December 30 2010
Because your evidences are not consistent to the conclusion that you present or that you seek, I feel oblige to dismiss your efforts. In fact, I...
Reply

Showing page 21 - 23 of 23 comments | View More Comments »

Page 3 of 3 • page 21 - 23 of 23 « First  ‹ Prev  1 2 3  Next ›  Last »